Integrating the Internet into the Classroom Facilitator: Michael Krauss Evaluation of Faculty and Course This is an anonymous evaluation. Course Name: (select one) ed648 LING 410/510 Instructor: Term: Grading Scale: 5=highest A. Faculty Member 1. Knowledge of subject. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 2. Appropriate use of workshop time. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 3. Effective use of workshop materials. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 4. Skill in facilitating discussion and participation. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 5. Respectful of participants. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 6. Encouragement for participants to think for themselves. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 7. Approachability. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 8. Presentation style. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 9. Use of technology in presentation 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 10. Overall effectiveness 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply B. Workshop 1. Quality of materials. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 2. Appropriate attention to theory. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 3. Appropriate attention to practice. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 4. Relevance to professional development. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 5. Overall rating of workshop. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply Comments on the faculty member: Strengths and weaknesses? Suggestions for improving his/her teaching? Comments on the workshop: Strengths and weakness in content and organization? How has the workshop contributed to your professional knowledge and skill development? C. Additional Comments: Thank you for your time! Click "Submit" to complete your evaluation. ©2010 All Rights Reserved. Return to top. Return to Syllabus-at-a-Glance. Return to Workshop Home Page. Created by: Updated: 3/23/10
Integrating the Internet into the Classroom Facilitator: Michael Krauss
This is an anonymous evaluation.
Course Name: (select one) ed648 LING 410/510 Instructor: Term:
A. Faculty Member
1. Knowledge of subject. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 2. Appropriate use of workshop time. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 3. Effective use of workshop materials. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 4. Skill in facilitating discussion and participation. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 5. Respectful of participants. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 6. Encouragement for participants to think for themselves. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 7. Approachability. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 8. Presentation style. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 9. Use of technology in presentation 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 10. Overall effectiveness 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
2. Appropriate use of workshop time. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
3. Effective use of workshop materials. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
4. Skill in facilitating discussion and participation. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
5. Respectful of participants. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
6. Encouragement for participants to think for themselves. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
7. Approachability. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
8. Presentation style. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
9. Use of technology in presentation 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
10. Overall effectiveness 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
B. Workshop
1. Quality of materials. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 2. Appropriate attention to theory. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 3. Appropriate attention to practice. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 4. Relevance to professional development. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply 5. Overall rating of workshop. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
2. Appropriate attention to theory. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
3. Appropriate attention to practice. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
4. Relevance to professional development. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
5. Overall rating of workshop. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply
Comments on the faculty member: Strengths and weaknesses? Suggestions for improving his/her teaching?
Comments on the workshop: Strengths and weakness in content and organization? How has the workshop contributed to your professional knowledge and skill development?
C. Additional Comments:
Return to top. Return to Syllabus-at-a-Glance. Return to Workshop Home Page. Created by: Updated: 3/23/10