|
College of Arts
& Sciences
Faculty Meeting Minutes
December 1, 1999
Call to Order, 3:33 PM
Approval of Minutes, November 3, 1999
meeting
President's Report
The College has been awarded $1
million in funding for a new building at the Law School,
through a joint effort of the Arizona and Oregon
Congressional delegations, to house a Crime Victims
Institute.
The College has also received a $1
million grant for a Lewis and Clark bicentennial building to
be located on the main campus. Architectural and engineering
studies have begun. The building will see additional uses
such as lectures and conferences, even during the
bicentennial. We hope to build a "true and proper conference
center," possibly with a major auditorium. Work continues on
subsequent federal grants, possibly up to a total of $10
million. The College trustees, as well as Senators Smith and
Wyden, have all helped in these efforts. The Center for
Social Sciences is an unrelated project, and will not be
affected by these efforts.
Regarding assessment: No, it will not
go away. We do have to be as thoughtful as possible about
developing a credible accreditation process. We need to
satisfy government agencies that would otherwise be happy to
step in and measure our educational outcomes. We also need
to satisfy parents. We need to create a process that is our
own.
Dean's Report
Remaining meetings this academic year
will be Miller 105. Thanks to those who participated in the
recent Academic Fair. After the Fair the Deans discussed the
event with their chairs and passed their comments on to the
Academic Council and to the Admissions Office.
The Task Force on Information Literacy
is up and running. Its members are Jim Kopp, Bret Ingerman
and Professors Gernot Blume, Robert Goldman, Robert Owens
and Richard Rohrbaugh.
The Murdock Trust has invited us to
submit a full proposal due February 15, which provides
expert consultants in the area of utilization of in
information literacy to facilitate learning and instruction.
Trinh Tran will work with Dean Atkinson to coordinate the
grant proposal, in consultation with the Task Force and
faculty committees.
At this year's first meeting of the
Committee on Promotion and Tenure, someone raised the issue
of students influencing other students during course and
instructor evaluation sessions. The Committee recommended
that the dean intervene. A reminder about the need for
silence has been added to the instructions that student
proctors read when administering the evaluations.
Regarding our Academic Integrity
Policy: We are featured in the Templeton Guide to Colleges
as one of 35 schools with exemplary academic integrity
policies. No cases have been brought to the Honor Board so
far this year, but please remember that this is the time of
year when incidents can occur.
Discussion:
- Could designated students from
SAAB or some other group run the evaluation
sessions?
- Evaluations take up substantial
class time; can we reconsider our approach?
- Some schools do their evaluations
through the registrar's office, requiring students to
present a receipt from that office before taking their
final exams.
- A student visitor was introduced,
and commented that discussions have been common among
students during evaluation sessions at which he/she has
been present.
- A number of faculty members
expressed their surprise and serious
concern.
- Can we reconsider having
faculty remain in the room during evaluation sessions,
as we used to? Some studies support the idea that this
approach produces a bias.
- Dean Atkinson will take the
matter to the Faculty Council.
Reports of Standing
Committees
Committee on Admissions, Awards
& Academic Standing, Deborah Lycan
AAAS is working in three areas at
present:
1. Changes in selection processes for
Rogers, Pamplin, and Cheney awards. A new timetable gives
students more time to prepare applications, and committees
more time to evaluate applications. A culture of late
applications has developed, with committee chairs reviewing
reasons for lateness. This situation was problematic.
Applying is a choice, not an assignment. Accepting late
applications is unlike the "real world," and makes the
process cumbersome. New language has been developed to state
that all late applications will be returned to students.
Students are now responsible for insuring that all
recommendations are received by the deadline. Faculty will
give these to students in sealed and signed envelopes. Also,
the committee is looking at the method by which class
standing is determined for application purposes. The current
method, using credit hours as the indicator of class
standing, has worked against applicants. Any change in
procedure will be for this purpose only. Question/Comment:
Haven't there been problems when students are overseas?
Reply: There will be an exception made for overseas
students.
2. Dean's List and Latin
Honors
The new Latin honors requirement (GPA
3.7) has produced a situation where students can graduate
with honors without ever having been on the Dean's list (GPA
3.75). The committee proposes changing the Dean's list
threshold to 3.7.
3. Academic Performance Language in
College Catalog [see handout provided at meeting].
Language on the relationship between academic performance
and course grading was dropped from the catalog when we
changed from quarters to semesters. The committee believes
it would be useful to add new language to the catalog, and
is seeking e-mail comments on the proposed language. A
handout summarizing the proposed language was
distributed.
Discussion:
Comments were made regarding the
relative merits of "extended" vs. "brief" language on
performance and grades. It was noted that definitions vary
across departments and instructors. "Consent of instructor"
provision for continuing in a subject after receiving a D
grade may be problematic. There may be no faculty consensus
on what constitutes appropriate performance-grade
relationship. Statistically, the average grade at Lewis and
Clark is B. Having written guidelines is beneficial in
providing a foundation for conversations with students. Dean
Atkinson assumes this matter has been entered as a
resolution for debate and approval at our next CAS faculty
meeting; meanwhile e-mail comments are
encouraged.
Curriculum Committee, Jack
Hart
The committee has reviewed the
academic calendar for the next four years. As an experiment,
during the 2000-2001 year Fall semester exams will be done
in four days. The next four years are easy to accomplish
within the desired time frame; the following two years will
be more difficult. Thanks to Bob Owens for developing these
calendars.
Dell Smith presented the 10-year
academic calendars, 2001-2010. A ten year sequence is
required to go through a full cycle. Fall semesters 2004,
2005, 2009 will have no fall break. All years except 2002,
2003, 2008 have 17-week summers; those three years have 16
week summers but a longer winter break.
Committee on Educational
Technology, Harry Schleef
Patrick Ryle has been selected as our
new Director of Media Services, and will begin work on
Monday, 12/6.
Committee on the Library, Jim
Grant
Regarding copyright issues: Current
legal standards are more generous than they used to be, and
consider instructor intent. A group is at work to develop a
revised policy on fair use of copyrighted
material.
Meeting Adjourned: 4:50
p.m.
|