Lewis & Clark College




Academic Council

Meeting Notes

November 14, 2000


Present: Curtis Johnson, Dean of the College; Dinah Dodds, Dean of Arts and Humanities; Gary Reiness, Dean of Mathematical and Natural Sciences; Harry Schleef, Dean of Social Sciences; Terri Banasek, administrative assistant and recorder; and Rosie Felton, administrative assistant for budgets and contracts. Guests: Greg Walters, director of human resources; and Cindy Wray, Benefits and HRIS Manager

Long-Term Topics

  1. Computer Replacement Plan: The Academic Council, in conjunction with IT, will devise a form to determine future computer needs for faculty. The form will contain specific questions regarding usage and the probability of the present computer meeting anticipated needs. The Council would then be able to assess needs and prioritize requests. The appropriate timeframe for this process would be early fall, beginning in 2001. The process for requests for equipment for next fall will begin as soon as the form is devised.

    The Council agreed to invite June Jones and a representative from IT to the Nov. 21 meeting to discuss the plan.

  2. Chairs' Responsibilities: Dean Dodds reported on her meeting with chairs in Arts and Humanities. 1) They feel strongly about retaining the course release. The tradeoff of additional compensation in lieu of a course release does not appear to be a viable option. 2) The advisee load is distributed unequally across departments, with the chair taking on advisees for faculty who are overseas or on sabbatical. Some chairs felt that only certain faculty should do pre-major advising, with students meeting at the beginning of the school year with pre-major advisor and have subsequent meetings with department faculty or with someone the student knows. 3) Some chairs think the chair's responsibilities do not extend to significant issues and are limited to unimportant or bureaucratic tasks.

    Dean Dodds suggested advising mentors - senior faculty who can work with junior faculty on advising skills. There is currently no way to hold faculty accountable for their advising. Dean Johnson stated that the obvious way to get at this is to identify individuals who don't advise and help them with this skill. Dean Schleef pointed out that there is some confusion about whether advising is service or teaching. It says in the handbook that it is teaching; but if it is part of teaching, it is not valued at the same level as classroom teaching. Dean Johnson will check to see whether the topic of advising is being addressed in the Commission on Teaching or in AAAS. Guidelines must be set right away.

    The Council agreed they need a clear definition of the important things that chairs do. The divisional deans will gather that information at the next chairs meeting.

    Suggestions for streamlining chairs' duties:
    • Move responsibility for writing salary review letters from chair to divisional dean.
    • Move other responsibilities to the divisional deans.
    • Give chairs more long-term, significant responsibilities in direction of department, to include responsibility for planning for adjuncts.
    • Identify mundane administrative tasks that can be performed by department secretaries or delegated to other members of the department.
    • Course scheduling - could possibly be done by department secretary in conjunction with department faculty.
  3. Adjuncts: The divisional deans each presented reports on courses taught by adjuncts in their respective divisions. Dean Johnson requested the total number of courses from Deans Dodds and Reiness as well as a breakdown by department from Dean Schleef. The dean's office will then compile the data into one report. That report would contain the total number of courses taught by adjuncts and a breakdown by department for last year and this year.

    Dean Johnson would like to use the data to attempt to determine how permanent the reliance is on adjuncts as well as to see which parts are being fixed by the searches and to determine the acceptable level of adjuncts in the classroom. We can't answer the entire question until we know the probability of successful searches for next year. Course schedules must be done by early December, and then the Council will know what the departments need. That will drive what we can do about adjuncts.

Agenda Items

  1. Gernot Blume's sabbatical application was approved.

  2. Parental Leave: Greg Walters and Cindy Wray reported on different options for a parental leave policy for faculty, including distribution of the College's family medical leave policy. Human Resources needs clarity on how to pay faculty for different types of leave.

    Oregon law allows a separate 12-week bank for pregnancy leave, plus an additional 12 weeks for other qualifying conditions. Birth mothers can combine pregnancy leave and parental leave. This is unpaid leave, and it supersedes any College policy. Childbirth is considered a serious illness and is covered under short-term disability policy.

    Two things to consider in building the policy are how it affects the tenure process and giving flexibility to allow semester replacements. Mr. Walters recommends going back to what was decided last year and asking specific questions. He has talked to colleagues at other institutions and discovered a wide variety of policies.

    The Academic Council agreed on six weeks of leave available to each faculty member at the beginning of the academic year, with the leave being dependent upon meeting the qualifying conditions for state and federal leave and requiring documentation from doctors. This policy could also apply to fathers. This would provide six weeks paid leave, with anything beyond that unpaid. Short-term disability would start after the six weeks for mothers who give birth.

    Birth mothers would get full semester off including short-term disability. Fathers could get College's six weeks off paid and then take the rest of the semester unpaid. The policy should specify that semester leave is a two-course semester to the extent that we can control it. To limit the College's liability, we could build in a provision that if it is the three-course semester, compensation would not include the third course.

    Dean Johnson will take the plan to Greg Walters for him to spell out the planning for the six weeks, ensuring that the College's disability policy covers birth mothers for the entire semester.

  3. Mathematics Position: It is not a good idea to jump into new searches until the Commission on Academic Priorities has come forth with recommendations. The normal time for submission for new positions is spring semester.

  4. Biology Search: The committee has received vitas from senior applicants. Because the position was advertised as assistant professor level, the College is required to hire at that level. It is possible, however, to offer earlier consideration for tenure.

  5. Faculty Meeting Attendance: Some faculty have complained about how trivial the meetings are. Attendance will improve if there are substantive issues before the faculty. Dean Johnson has urged the Faculty Council to bring issues and has emailed the faculty as well. Some of the chairs have said that the College has lots of committees that don't always come up with tangible results. Perhaps the Academic Council could give the faculty some options to discuss rather than refer topics to committees. The Council considers the opinions and advice given by faculty to be very important.

Next meeting, Tuesday, November 20, 8 a.m., in the dean's office.

 


L&C Front

Law School

Graduate School

Admissions

News & Events

Phone Directory

Search