Lewis & Clark College




Academic Council

Meeting Notes

September 12, 2000


Present: Curtis Johnson, Dean of the College; Dinah Dodds; Dean of Arts and Humanities; Gary Reiness, Dean of Mathematical and Natural Sciences; Harold Schleef, Dean of Social Sciences; Terri Banasek, Administrative Assistant and recorder; and Rosie Felton, Administrative Assistant for Budgets and Contracts. Guests: Jane Atkinson, Vice President and Provost; and June Jones, Associate Provost.

Announcements:

  • Update about space planning: The original plan was to move faculty out of Albany in January. The planning process for Howard Hall has been pushed back six months, and faculty will be moved out of Albany in June. Only the Social Sciences Division is affected.

  • Dean Reiness expressed concern about there not being enough time in regular Academic Council meetings to address larger issues facing the College as well as cover all agenda items. It was decided to begin meetings one hour earlier, at 8 a.m., with the first hour devoted to long-term matters.

Agenda Items:

  1. Hiring of Foreign Nationals: Greg Caldwell informed Dean Johnson of a problem with Hideo Watanabe's visa and green card. Mr. Caldwell should be included in the process of hiring foreign nationals as he knows the process for obtaining visas.

    Dean Reiness suggested that the College should have an immigration lawyer on retainer to assist in the time-consuming process of attaining permanent resident status for faculty. Dean Johnson will follow up on the suggestion.

    Documentation for the government must contain proof that the foreign national is the best candidate for the position. The College's open search process provides adequate documentation.

  2. Computer Situation: The Academic Council is interested in trying to convey their concern to people who are in the position to influence this matter and to learn from June Jones about the policies currently in place for replacement and upgrades of faculty computers.

    Ms. Jones reported that of the $800,000 authorized this past year for capital equipment, half was for computers. There is real pressure on the capital expenditure funds, and not all expenses surrounding the reorganization have been gathered.

    Before Bret Ingerman left, a decision was made to get the new administrative computers installed first, with the older computers (some only two to three years old) used to meet the most serious needs of the faculty. So much time was spent getting the plan instituted that IT lost time for installing the computers. The administrative replacement cycle won't be completed until November or December, and the old computers are now sitting in IT with no one available to install them for the faculty. Right now there is no plan for designated places for these computers. Jane Atkinson will need to address the situation in her role as the acting director of IT.

    June Jones found no documentation for the eight laptop computers that were to have been ordered for the Biology Department.

    The pressure on the capital equipment fund really concerns June Jones. There is a lot of work in completing the reorganization, with additional problems surfacing following the departure of Wayne Pederson. There are a lot of unanswered questions on who does what on the budget side. We need to stop and assess where we are financially.

    Dean Johnson expressed the standpoint of the faculty. There are some highly urgent computer needs in the faculty, and some replacements are way overdue. We need to alleviate that pressure right away. The other part of the problem is that the process is not working right now. A lot of the requests for new equipment were not coming through the divisional deans, and Jane Atkinson and IT cannot assess which are the high priority needs. The Academic Council will compile a list by this time next week of the highest urgency cases.
    Whatever planning process is designed, the divisional deans must play a central and important role in the process; and the process must be conveyed to the faculty. The Academic Council needs to have Jane Atkinson's and June Jones' assurances that the replacement process will move forward.

    Dean Schleef commented that the process for requesting equipment is not clear. Is this a rolling process or is there a season for these requests? He noted Sharon Barnes' need for a new computer in the Social Science division office and wondered if she fell under the administrative or academic needs. June Jones explained that anything under Dean Johnson is considered academic.

    Dean Schleef pointed out each department needs to determine their computer needs and then go through the divisional deans. He understands that the goal is to replace all computers when they are four years old, but some computers must be replaced more often due to advanced technology. The Council thinks that any plan must have some flexibility so that any faculty member can get new equipment outside the four-year cycle.

    June Jones proposed that each year the divisional deans put together a list of priorities and that the Academic Council then review the list. Once a plan is devised, the process will be straightforward.

    June Jones will determine a budget amount, and the Academic Council can take priorities and work within that amount. IT can possibly hire someone on a temporary basis to get the computers to the faculty or perhaps take a week off from the administrative upgrade to install the academic computers.

    Dean Reiness believes there is a lack of documentation about budgetary decisions. June Jones explained that those decisions are made in consultation with the divisional deans. After she contacts the deans with approvals, the deans can then convey the information to the departments. Capital expenditures, by definition, are $5,000 or more.

    Dean Reiness summarized that the divisional deans are to go back to their departments to get priorities, Academic Council will pass this list along to June Jones. Urgent requests will be met within two weeks. June Jones pointed out that what would be most helpful is a description of what faculty need in terms of function and what they need to accomplish.

  3. Curriculum Committee: Susan Glosser and Kurt Fosso both have other committee commitments. Dean Dodds will approach Lyell Asher and Micha Grudin regarding a one-semester term on the committee.

Next meeting: September 19, 2000, 9 a.m., in Breakfast Room.

 


L&C Front

Law School

Graduate School

Admissions

News & Events

Phone Directory

Search