Lewis & Clark College




Academic Council

Meeting Minutes

December 9, 2003


Present: Curtis Johnson, Dean of the College; Stephanie Arnold, Dean of Arts and Humanities; Harry Schleef, Dean of Social Sciences; Robert Nayer, Director of Operating and Capital Budgets; Terri Banasek, administrative assistant and recorder; and Jim Walker, Vice President for Business and Finance and Treasurer of the College.

Absent: Gary Reiness, Dean of Mathematical and Natural Sciences

 

Announcements

  • Faculty/Student Summer Research Grant applications are due February 13.

 

Agenda Items:

  1. Minutes of November 18 and 25 were approved.

  2. Dean Johnson said that he is seeing quite a few courses this spring with enrollments of fewer than 10 (some with fewer than six). There are eight courses in English and eight in history with fewer than 10; a number of them have two-five students. He is concerned - these are not all 400-level courses; some are 200- and 300-level courses. He reminded the Academic Council that department should be instructed to offer courses with predictably small enrollments only every other year or every third year. Dean Johnson asked the divisional deans to remind chairs of that policy for future reference. We need to avoid having this happen again.

    Dean Johnson said that the number of these courses raises the question of why this occurs. He has heard that is a direct result of the increasing reliance on adjuncts in the last couple of years. The adjuncts, in general, don't perform as well as tenure-track for our students. Students do not connect well to the adjunct faculties in these departments. If that is the case, we need to redouble our efforts to reduce reduction on reliance on adjuncts (especially in 100-level courses.

  3. Dean Johnson asked the divisional deans to make sure that tenure-track faculty are carrying their share of lower-division courses. In looking at fall of 2003, there are some departments where it is really troubling. One department in particular has all of the 100-level courses taught by adjuncts. Dean Johnson asked the deans to pass along to faculty that the best way to improve retention is to have tenure-track faculty in introductory-level courses.

    Dean Arnold thinks that trying to get a clearer picture of the factors here is rather significant. She is about to embark on a conversation with arts and humanities chairs about general education requirements in the humanities. Part of the problem is very irregular department planning. It has to do with people feeling over-burdened, whether that is true or not. Some chairs are more effective than others. Planning doesn't take place in a coherent way. Absences are not planned far enough in advance. A number of factors are involved. It is critical in her division that planning be done in a more effective way.

    When asked by Dean Johnson how the Academic Council can help with that planning, Dean Arnold responded that she doesn't have enough information yet to give a full opinion. The question of course release vs. stipend for chairs may be a factor. Are some chairs over-burdened? Department chairing is the last thing that they do - it has become a marginalized activity.

    Dean Johnson is not interested in re-instituting a course release for chairing. That is the problem we are trying to address. We need to connect good chairing with their self-interest. Good chairs are not just helping the College, they are helping themselves.

    In thinking about the review process, Dean Arnold asked how we reward service as well as scholarship. Perhaps including chairing in that would be helpful. Dean Schleef pointed out that we don't review chairs.

    Dean Johnson said he would be happy to put chairing and other service more in the front and center of the focus when reviews are done. Conversely, should penalties be instituted for poor chairing?

    Dean Schleef raised the question of course assignments for next year. He is concerned about Inventing America and how it will be staffed. He has a preliminary estimate, and his division is down from what it has offered in the past. While there are number of reasons for it, his division will be coming up short. Dean Schleef added that what is lacking this year is the targets from Ben Westervelt; Dean Johnson will request the information from Dr. Westervelt. Dean Arnold noted that she received information from Angie McGinnis concerning what had been done in the past by arts and humanities and what the actual targets for next year are; Dean Johnson will request that same information for Dean Schleef.

  4. Dean Arnold reported that Ted Vogel thinks the College possibly can get $3,000 for the clay mixer to offset some of the cost of the replacement. She also asked the music department for an inventory of musical instruments. They have just begun discussions, so she has no further information.

    Dean Johnson reviewed the capital project requests from Steve Wallo:

    1. Increase size of women's locker rooms
    2. Development of 4th Avenue property

    He also reviewed the priority capital equipment requests:

    Mr. Nayer reviewed the capital projects to be presented at the budget committee on Dec. 9, for a total of about $4 million.

 


L&C Front

Law School

Graduate School

Admissions

News & Events

Phone Directory

Search