AAAS - Admissions, Awards and Academic Standing Committee

Minutes of November 11, 1998

 

Present: Chair Kurt Fosso, Kevin Holloway, Barbara Balko, Alicia Gilbert, Deborah Lycan, Michael Ford, Michael Sexton, Dell Smith, Glendi Gaddis, Shannon Benfield-Blankenship, Ashley Schmitt (invited), Sharon Barnes (secretary)

Absent: Shannon Benfield-Blankenship, Greg Caldwell, Kristi Williams, and Dale Holloway

Chair Kurt Fosso opened the meeting at 3:10. The minutes of October 14, 1998 were approved with corrections.

  

Subcommittee Reports

Kurt Fosso reported that the Academic Standing Subcommittee approved one case for readmission.
Barbara Balko reported that the Petitions and Waivers Subcommittee has had several petitions to consider. A repeat pattern has developed to have the Caribbean Cultures accepted as a Core substitute. Barb suggested that the Curriculum Committee should consider making this change.

Deborah Lycan reported that the other subcommittee members for Honors and Awards are Annie Dawid and Janet Davidson as well as Alicia Gilbert and Shannon Benfield-Blankenship. Alicia will be on the internal awards committee (Cheney, Pamplin Corp. and Mary Stuart Rogers fellowships). Those applicants will be reviewed in early February. Shannon will be on the subcommittee for the Neeley and Trustee scholarships, which will meet in April. Dean of Admissions Michael Sexton said that Admissions narrows down the candidates to the top 125 for the Neeley and Trustee scholarship awards. The committee meets on one day in about a five-hour period where Michael orients the committee to previous procedures for selecting the Neeley and Trustee recipients, and then the committee reads the files, which are grouped by GPAs, SATs, etc., as well as strength of school curriculum. Michael Ford volunteered to help the committee as a nonvoting member.

 

Rescheduling AAAS Meeting

The Committee decided to meet on the regularly scheduled Wednesday -- December 9th and cut the meeting short if the CAS Christmas party occurs at the same time.

 

Proposed Changes to Academic Integrity Policies and Procedures Document

Kurt Fosso with the help of Ashley Schmitt developed a resolution to present at the December faculty meeting to modify the document on academic integrity policies and procedures. The resolution was approved to go forward to the faculty with a phrase omission.

 

Latin Honors

Registrar Dell Smith summarized the choices available to the Committee for implementing Latin Honors. After some discussion, the Committee approved the following:

  • Latin Honors will be written into the commencement program with a disclaimer that they are not official until spring grades are calculated
     
  • Latin Honors for the purposes of announcing at commencement will be calculated as of the end of fall semester. [Should this be done after the date to make up incompletes?]
     
  • GPA will be determined solely upon the student's academic work at Lewis & Clark. Other institution grades will not be considered for Latin Honors.

 

Matriculation

Dean of Admissions Michael Sexton explained that even though the numbers of admitted students were down this year, that the retention of continuing students increased and the overall difference was about $40,000 to the College with the reduced discount rate. There were large drops in the matriculated California admittees. It is too soon to know if the decrease of new students is a trend. Some factors that may attract or turn away students are uncompetitive financial aid packages, room and board requirements, the core course, how they were approached and contacted.

In 1996, it cost about $254 per capita to recruit students and $1685 per matriculant. Lewis & Clark spends less money in recruiting than most other like institutions. Kevin Holloway suggested that we might be spending our dollars on the wrong targeted group. He said we might focus on a different group to get a potentially more successful matriculation. Michael Sexton said it would be fine to have fewer applicants if the result was matriculant numbers increasing.

Kurt Fosso said the website costs much less than publications. Students do a lot of browsing of websites. Our website could be much more attractive. Michael said that a College committee determines the institutional site and that IT had its budget cut, and is working with fewer people. There is no one person dedicated to maintaining and developing the website -- the IT people have several different responsibilities and this is one of them. We are making some web improvement, but not a large amount. The catalog is out on the site earlier this year than last.

Kevin Holloway asked about the $40,000 impact. If the discount rate had not changed, where would we have been? Michael Sexton answered that he did not know. Kevin asked if there is a continuing decrease in the number of students, will the dollars go down? Mike confirmed that would be the case. If the retention rate went up 1%, the income could offset the decrease in application numbers. Kevin noted that we could be in worse shape if the numbers continue to go down. Michael Sexton said that the data reporting is misleading when looking only at one variable. Mike also said it takes time to get into a new market. Kevin said that Admissions makes the College's name known, the school actually does the recruiting.

Dean of Students Michael Ford said the California matriculants were down 50%. Financial Aid Director Glendi Gaddis commented on the percentage of Californians who qualify for financial aid. Michael Sexton said that last fall 35% of our enrollment came from 102 schools who had four or more students at Lewis & Clark. This year 30% came from only 87 schools that have four or more students enrolled.

Kevin Holloway said we should look at other avenues to recruit students.

Michael Sexton said that he received good feedback on the admitted student questionnaire, which is administered every other year. Faculty involvement is uneven, yet important and done less than at overlap schools, based on students' answers from a year ago. Living accommodations are a large concern. We need to look at the things students wanted when coming to Lewis & Clark.

Kevin asked why do students go elsewhere? Glendi said students look at job placement. Michael Sexton said that students go elsewhere because of 1) financial aid, 2) parental decisions, and 3) most college students go to college within 200 miles of their home.

Kevin: The Admissions packet is great and was a deciding factor for him to come to Lewis & Clark. Are there elements of campus life that turn off students?

Michael Sexton: General education flexibility in view of the larger structure is very attractive to those enrolled. Mike noted that twelve percent of the students indicated interest in the new environmental studies major, pointing toward future resource issues.

Michael Ford: Dell talked about two key issues for matriculation: 1) financial aid, and 2) academic advising. We had much less trouble this fall. More people were around when students wanted room changes, and more rooms were available to accommodate their needs. More students were satisfied their first term this year. More critical information into faculty hands would create more satisfaction because faculty would be aware of students' problems.

Glendi Gaddis: Financial factors are also a consideration -- what is an education at Lewis & Clark worth to my family and me?

Michael Sexton: Turnover is largest with the freshman class. There is not a large turnover after the sophomore year.

Shannon Benfield-Blankenship: There is not enough diversity or student leaders - the opportunity is there, there is not enough participation by students.

Kurt Fosso: We need to generate sense of belonging in the students. Could we have seed money?

Michael Ford: The Trustees approved $340,000 student fees to be allocated for the students.

Michael Sexton: It costs money to recruit any targeted group. Diversity is a concern. Deciding factors on where to spend money and groups to target lie with the enrollment management team, policy issues lie with AAAS. We should continue this conversation in the future.

Barbara Balko: What do we do with the information?

Kurt Fosso: The college needs to create a more attractive web page -- it is cheaper than printing publications.

Shannon Benfield-Blankenship: Look at Vanderbilt's web page.

Barbara Balko: Chemistry gets 100 hits a week.

Kurt Fosso: For our next meeting we will take a look at web materials. Look at other schools and links they use to get some ideas.

Glendi: We could use CD-ROMs for targeted admits, and follow up via e-mail with a welcome. E-mail is much easier for faculty recruitment and can create an ongoing e-mail conversation. Barbara said that using e-mail will create more one-on-one contact.

Alicia Gilbert: If CD-ROMs are too expensive we could use VCR tapes to show the college.

Shannon: Clips of 30 seconds or one minute each could be placed in different sites on the College's web page.

Kurt Fosso: Agenda for the December meeting will include matriculation, faculty involvement, web page, and faculty advising.

Next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 9, 1998. The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m.


Created by: barnes@lclark.edu
Updated: 10-DEC-98