AAAS - Admissions, Awards and Academic Standing Committee

Minutes

January 29, 1999

 

Present: Chair Barbara Balko, Kevin Holloway, Deborah Lycan, Michael Sexton, Dell Smith, Shannon Benfield-Blankenship, Kristi Williams, Alicia Gilbert, and Sharon Barnes (secretary)

Absent: Greg Caldwell, Dale Holloway, Michael Ford, Glendi Gaddis, and June Jones

Chair Barbara Balko opened the meeting at 3:10. The minutes of December 9, 1998 were approved.
 

Subcommittee Reports

Kevin Holloway reported that the Academic Standing Subcommittee had 108 student actions.

Barbara Balko reported that the Petitions and Waivers Subcommittee met and dealt with the usual type of requests.

Deborah Lycan reported on the Honors and Awards Subcommittee. She said the subcommittee of Cheney, Pamplin Corp and Mary Stuart Rogers fellowships will meet Wednesday, February 24. The other subcommittee for the Neeley and Trustee scholarships will meet Tuesday, March 2. Both subcommittees have five faculty and one student member. The second subcommittee also has some administrators as non-voting members.
 

Wording for Latin Honors

Dell Smith submitted wording for recognition of Latin Honors in the commencement program and also suggested wording for students who wish to include Latin Honors in their resumés before official determination. Dell said that the person's name would be on one line and the honor on a separate line in the program. A minor change was made.

The AAAS Committee approved wording.
 

Results of Academic Advising Surveys

Kristi Williams distributed the results of the New Student Orientation surveys from first-year students. Most of the results were at the midpoint (4-5 on a scale from 0-7). Kristi said the results were a little higher than she expected, but Dell thought they were a bit lower, or at best neutral. Deborah Lycan asked about whether Kristi had determined the variance or standard deviation for the advising survey scores. This number is important because it tells us whether we have a score of 4-5 because everyone thinks we are doing an average/mediocre job, or because half of the students think we are doing an excellent job and the other half thinks we are doing a terrible job. Kristi said that these numbers had not been determined, but that the data was entered in a spreadsheet and could be generated and that she would look into this.

Alicia Gilbert suggested that a survey of the same class be administered the second semester of the sophomore year and compare it to the current survey. She thinks the results will be lower at the end of the sophomore year. Deborah Lycan said that the sciences get majors earlier since they need to go through their classes in a certain order. They don't do as much generalist advising. Kristi expressed concern when a student adviser says, "I can't help you because you are not majoring in my area." She said they should be referred to other departments. Shannon Benfield-Blankenship wanted to know if the students are asking the right questions.

Dell said that beginning next fall junior and senior students couldn't register until they have declared a major.

Deborah said that when a student asks her about an overseas program, she tells the student to go to the overseas office for information. She also advises students to take introductory courses in areas they are considering as their major. Dell said that one of the purposes in first year advising is to get students connected with the college. Alicia stated that in her almost four years at Lewis & Clark she has not had a consistent professor/advisor connection. She said that professors went on sabbatical and she never achieved connection with any one person.

Michael Sexton read a comment on the survey, "My professor never returns my call." He said if there is one, there must be others. The problem is that advising is not rewarded. Good advisors volunteer because they enjoy advising. Barbara Balko suggested including advising as part of the community service requirement for faculty. Deborah Lycan said some faculty took on a large number of advisees and then found there was no time to adequately advise them all.

Dell Smith said there is informal and casual advising and there is formal advising. Casual advising can happen in class and conversation outside of class. Formal advising is a scheduled time between advisee and advisor.

Michael Sexton said there seems to have been a culture change through the years where the role and perception of advising has changed.

Dell asked, what goals should be set for group advising? What goals are specific to individuals? June Jones contracts new faculty by August 15, so a two-week period can be spent orienting them on the classroom and advising [implemented August 15, 1998]. This will be done each year with every new group of faculty that comes in.

Kristi said there are not enough people when only tenure track faculty are advisers. Alicia suggested brown bag workshops for faculty on advising letting them know that advising has at least two stages. The first step in advising is to sign the registration form. The second step in advising is to get to know advisees personally.

Deborah Lycan asked, "Is there a minimum level of responsibility that should be required?" It was suggested to publish names of those who are not returning calls or signing forms. Deborah said she would rather have a system that rewards rather than punishes.

Kristi said that 60% of the students change their major once it is declared.

Michael Sexton said we should be just as concerned about the continuing students as well as the new incoming students. Alicia said that we currently sell Lewis & Clark when recruiting and then once the students are at the college, there is no continuing follow through. Why not promote the college while they're here? Shannon commented on the research pressure for junior faculty taking up a great deal of their time. Kristi said that some schools have a class with the professor in that class as the students' advisor.

Dell said that the time currently suggested for advising is 1/2 hour for individual advising and two hours for group advising. He expressed concern that expectations are unrealistic since there is too small of an amount of time to get connected. Dell is a group-advising advocate. He said group advising can take place in many different places like in the home, at school, or elsewhere. The purpose in advising is first to register, then at some point the adviser should contact advisees inviting them to a brown bag seminar, dinner, some gathering, or maybe there are other ways of accomplishing that contact. Several years ago, advisors had tables in Fields Dining Room with advisor names and the advisees would gather there and then they all went to the department. We need to consider what our real goal is.

Deborah said that maybe we need to look again at what our goals for advising are. Should we be trying to connect to students in a personal way, to their whole life, in freshman advising, or is the goal more modest, to make sure they get the right academic advising, so they can graduate on time and are working towards completing college requirements and getting the courses they need to help them decide what they want to major in? Lewis & Clark's current faculty population may see their responsibilities to advising more in the latter vein, more academic, and less personal.

Alicia said she was under the impression that because the student/faculty ratio was advertised at 1/12 that students would get to know the faculty. She has not found this to always be true.

Michael Sexton said that a student's making significant connection with an adult at a college has been statistically proven to increase chances of maintaining enrollment. He also said we need to continue recruiting students after they are at Lewis & Clark. Michael asked if advisers refer students to departments to talk with people who do know the answers?

Dell asked if there is funding for having meals and other events with advisees in order to establish connectivity.

Barbara Balko said the committee will continue with these ideas at the next meeting. The next faculty meeting will be in March and this committee will meet before then.
 

Registration Announcements Statement

Registrar Dell Smith posed the problem of students missing the first class of the semester. Currently there is no policy and practice is different between departments. What is appropriate at L&C? The wording would state that students are expected to attend the first class section -- if they must miss it, then they must contact the professor or department. If they do not contact the professor or department, then they will be dropped if they miss the first class. If the AAAS Committee agrees with this, then they may want to bring it up to the faculty as a whole. It could be published in the Registration Announcements. This was brought up because when classes are full and there is a waiting list, this gives students who are on the waiting list a chance to get into the class.

Michael Sexton said that faculty meet almost every week beginning in March.

Shannon is the chair of the Student Life Advisory Board Committee. He will report to the AAAS Committee on the effects of large class sizes on students and talk about issues of rentention.

Kevin Holloway asked if class sizes really make a difference? He recently visited Connecticut College where their introductory classes are 150 students or more. Seventy-five percent of our classes are 20 students or under.

The next AAAS Committee meetings are scheduled for Friday, February 26 at 2:00 p.m., Friday March 12 at 2:00 p.m. and Friday, April 16 at 2:00 p.m.

Meeting adjourned.


Created by: barnes@lclark.edu
Updated: 10-FEB-99